Thanks to Rahul and Simon for the explanation, also the document on
Wiki has been very useful to better understand the situation.
I think I'll keep reading the mailing list and maybe give some spot
contribution to the commons on a more active project or to some other
projects in Apache.
An
Hi Andrea,
Thanks for your offer of help. I'm sure everyone appreciates that.
However working on a project that you aren't personally using, and which
doesn't have an existing development team, is probably not a good way to
begin.
If you're keen to get involved with the Apache Java community I a
On 12/21/05, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Yeah I know... Was just assuming dormant mode already for my offer,
OK, I did miss that critical point earlier :-)
On 12/21/05, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not about finding a release manager, but about
The big one for me is to know why we'd want to have such a project.
Rome exists, it has a good license and it's getting used. There's no
reason to not develop redundant components if the itch is there, but
why work at creating the itch?
Good point indeed. I just stepped to volunteer helping o
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 12/21/05, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As I also said on the PMC list, I am not particularly interested in development
on feedparser, though I am willing to apply patches (if they are complete with
testcases).
Thanks for stepping forward Martin,
Phil Steitz wrote:
We need to make a decision on which way to go here...either demote
back to sandbox/dormant or have someone step up to drive this
component toward a release.
This is a clear case of demote to dormant IMHO.
Stephen
-
On 12/20/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We need to make a decision on which way to go here...either demote
> back to sandbox/dormant or have someone step up to drive this
> component toward a release.
>
> I am happy to help getting the site fixed (seems we just need to add
> it to the
On 12/21/05, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I also said on the PMC list, I am not particularly interested in
> development on feedparser, though I am willing to apply patches (if they are
> complete with testcases).
Thanks for stepping forward Martin, I have no background a
On 12/21/05, Andrea Alberto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am willing to start contributing to some project at the
> jakarta-commons and this could be a good possibility.
> I have java experience but no experience as a developer on RSS (but I
> think this is not a big problem).
>
Thanks a l
As I also said on the PMC list, I am not particularly interested in development
on feedparser, though I am willing to apply patches (if they are complete with
testcases).
Assuming dormant means you can still commit to it (else archive would have been
a better name probably), we can move it the
Hi,
I am willing to start contributing to some project at the
jakarta-commons and this could be a good possibility.
I have java experience but no experience as a developer on RSS (but I
think this is not a big problem).
Andrea
On 12/21/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We need to m
We need to make a decision on which way to go here...either demote
back to sandbox/dormant or have someone step up to drive this
component toward a release.
I am happy to help getting the site fixed (seems we just need to add
it to the nav, as http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/feedparser/ is
there
12 matches
Mail list logo
