On 12/20/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you done a visual code inspection? I would like some feedback on
whether the change works or not.
No, I was the one who created the patch. :-)
--
My wife Mary and I have been married for forty-seven years and not
once have we had
- Original Message
From: Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/20/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you done a visual code inspection? I would like some feedback on
whether the change works or not.
No, I was the one who created the patch. :-)
Ah, but I
On 12/6/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to add IO-101 to 1.3, and the minor EndianUtils findbug issue
I emailed about (I'll put that in JIRA so I don't lose it).
+1
IO-101 is closed.
I think we need some sort of confirmation if possible about IO-99. Its
quite a
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
I think we need some sort of confirmation if possible about IO-99. Its
quite a complex change.
Two weeks gone, no confirmation. And I do not think that the patch is
very complex.
Have you done a visual code inspection? I would like some feedback on
whether the change
old laptop hasn't completely died so I can extract
everything off it.
Stephen
- Original Message
From: Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 17 November, 2006 11:20:27 PM
Subject: Re: [io][fileupload] Releasing
On 12/5/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The release is now waiting on confirmation that IO-99 solves the
classloader issues. However, that seems to be outside [io] control.
I'd like to add IO-101 to 1.3, and the minor EndianUtils findbug issue
I emailed about (I'll put that in
Henri Yandell wrote:
On 12/5/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The release is now waiting on confirmation that IO-99 solves the
classloader issues. However, that seems to be outside [io] control.
I'd like to add IO-101 to 1.3, and the minor EndianUtils findbug issue
I emailed
@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 17 November, 2006 11:20:27 PM
Subject: Re: [io][fileupload] Releasing...?
On 11/17/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Should FileUpload wait on IO to release before releasing?
Time frame?
2) Does this issue impact either release:
http
On 11/18/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IO 1.3 is about ready to go. I am in the process of moving laptops ATM and
hoping that my old laptop hasn't completely died so I can extract everything
off it.
Ok, I need to restart the fileuploads vote anyways (lack of response,
in
Couple of things.
1) Should FileUpload wait on IO to release before releasing?
2) Does this issue impact either release:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-99
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On 11/17/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Should FileUpload wait on IO to release before releasing?
Time frame?
2) Does this issue impact either release:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-99
IMO, it doesn't. The situation sounds somewhat exotic and it is not
even
@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 17 November, 2006 11:20:27 PM
Subject: Re: [io][fileupload] Releasing...?
On 11/17/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Should FileUpload wait on IO to release before releasing?
Time frame?
2) Does this issue impact either release:
http://issues.apache.org
12 matches
Mail list logo
