[jira] Commented: (POOL-98) Make GenericObjectPool better extensible

2007-06-21 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12506780 ] Henning Schmiedehausen commented on POOL-98: Well, giving it away through a protected getter is not really

[jira] Commented: (POOL-98) Make GenericObjectPool better extensible

2007-06-21 Thread Phil Steitz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12506784 ] Phil Steitz commented on POOL-98: - OK, I understand the use case, but with the 1.3 pool impl, I don't think what you

[jira] Commented: (POOL-98) Make GenericObjectPool better extensible

2007-06-21 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12506802 ] Henning Schmiedehausen commented on POOL-98: ok, I can understand this. Any time frame on compositepool /

[pool] 2.0 releaese WAS: [jira] Commented: (POOL-98) Make GenericObjectPool better extensible

2007-06-21 Thread Phil Steitz
Leaving the ticket because this is really general discussion. snip. ok, I can understand this. Any time frame on compositepool / what is needed to get the code release-ready? As with all things apache, that depends on available volunteer cycles. I posted a straw man roadmap for both [pool]

[jira] Commented: (POOL-98) Make GenericObjectPool better extensible

2007-06-20 Thread Phil Steitz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12506659 ] Phil Steitz commented on POOL-98: - I don't think we want to expose the _pool, since this is actually a linked list of