[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Tim Mooney updated DAEMON-101:
------------------------------

    Description: 
Javadoc for the Daemon interface method start uses the word "avfter", should 
probably be "after".  The comment may also fail to close a <code> tag (which 
doesn't seem to be valid, anyway).

Full comment:
"Start the operation of this Daemon instance. This method is to be invoked by 
the environment after the init() method has been successfully invoked and 
possibly the security level of the JVM has been dropped. Implementors of this 
method are free to start any number of threads, but need to return control 
avfter having done that to enable invocation of the stop()-method."

  was:
Javadoc for the Daemon interface method start uses the word "avfter", should 
probably be "after".

Full comment:
"Start the operation of this Daemon instance. This method is to be invoked by 
the environment after the init() method has been successfully invoked and 
possibly the security level of the JVM has been dropped. Implementors of this 
method are free to start any number of threads, but need to return control 
avfter having done that to enable invocation of the stop()-method."


> Javadoc typo, says "avfter" should probably be "after"
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DAEMON-101
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-101
>             Project: Commons Daemon
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>         Environment: N/A, javadoc
>            Reporter: Tim Mooney
>            Priority: Trivial
>
> Javadoc for the Daemon interface method start uses the word "avfter", should 
> probably be "after".  The comment may also fail to close a <code> tag (which 
> doesn't seem to be valid, anyway).
> Full comment:
> "Start the operation of this Daemon instance. This method is to be invoked by 
> the environment after the init() method has been successfully invoked and 
> possibly the security level of the JVM has been dropped. Implementors of this 
> method are free to start any number of threads, but need to return control 
> avfter having done that to enable invocation of the stop()-method."

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to