DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27054] - [lang][patch] Javadoc fixes for ClassUtils

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27306] - [lang][patch] Javadoc fixes for CharSetUtils

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27306] - [lang][patch] Javadoc fixes for CharSetUtils

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27306] - [lang][patch] Javadoc fixes for CharSetUtils

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27306 [lang][patch] Javadoc fixes for CharSetUtils --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-27 22:34 --- Created an attachment (id=10602) javadoc patch (examples and parameter names) --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27306] New: - [lang][patch] Javadoc fixes for CharSetUtils

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27306 [lang][patch] Javadoc fixes for CharSetUtils Summary: [lang][patch] Javadoc fixes for CharSetUtils Product: Commons Version: Nightly Builds Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27054] - [lang][patch] Javadoc fixes for ClassUtils

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27054 [lang][patch] Javadoc fixes for ClassUtils [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Reso

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27054] - [lang][patch] Javadoc fixes for ClassUtils

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27054 [lang][patch] Javadoc fixes for ClassUtils --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-18 23:19 --- Created an attachment (id=10419) Fixes to some Javadoc errors in ClassUtils --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27054] New: - [lang][patch] Javadoc fixes for ClassUtils

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27054 [lang][patch] Javadoc fixes for ClassUtils Summary: [lang][patch] Javadoc fixes for ClassUtils Product: Commons Version: Nightly Builds Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Enhan

RE: [lang] [patch] Javadoc fixes

1 PM > To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' > Subject: [lang] [patch] Javadoc fixes > > > Hi! > > Here is a patch that corrects some Javadoc in CharRange, CharSet, > CharSetUtils, IntRange, DateUtils and FastDateFormat. > ---

[lang] [patch] Javadoc fixes

Hi! Here is a patch that corrects some Javadoc in CharRange, CharSet, CharSetUtils, IntRange, DateUtils and FastDateFormat. lang.zip Description: Zip archive - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

Re: Javdoc formatting (Was: [lang] [patch] Javadoc improvements)

My personal style is to put the between the paragraphs on the blank line. It has an advantage that it is less in the way when reading the comment in the source code. Similarly, I don't include the as its redundent in HTML (OK, I know we should incude it, but it works fine without it) Also, is

Javdoc formatting (Was: [lang] [patch] Javadoc improvements)

Henri Yandell wrote: I'm all for having consistent javadoc. Feel like writing up the 'rules' for the javadoc style you've ended up on? Hi! Here is the promised rules that I try to follow when writing javadoc. Ofcourse the Sun javadoc guidelines is used, this is only to be seen as an extension

Re: [lang] [patch] Javadoc improvements

Henri Yandell wrote: I'm all for having consistent javadoc. Feel like writing up the 'rules' for the javadoc style you've ended up on? Sure, I can always try to document it. I'll just want to finish the changes in the javadoc for o.a.c.lang.builder first. [From the files often changed I suspec

Re: [lang] [patch] Javadoc improvements

I'm all for having consistent javadoc. Feel like writing up the 'rules' for the javadoc style you've ended up on? [From the files often changed I suspect I'm the biggest offender and I'd like to stop offending :)] Or is it just that I'm not doing the sun how to write javadoc properly? I did disco

Re: [lang] [patch] Javadoc improvements

Stephen Colebourne wrote: Patch applied. (We haven't actually agreed on a format for html tags in javadoc, but I decided that there was other useful formatting in the patch as well - actually since this is committed, now a decision on the style is probably effectively taken for lang ;-). When

Re: [lang] [patch] Javadoc improvements

s are always welcome. Stephen - Original Message - From: "Fredrik Westermarck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 9:30 PM Subject: Re: [lang] [patch] Javadoc improvements > Quoti

[lang] [patch] Javadoc improvements

Hi! Here is a patch where I have added formatting to the Javadoc (only for the classes in o.a.c.lang not in the subpackages) so that the generated Javadoc is easier to read. Some typos was also fixed. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For addition

Re: [lang] [patch] Javadoc

Patch applied, thanks. Stephen - Original Message - From: "Fredrik Westermarck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 12:17 AM Subject: Re: [lang] [patch] Javadoc > Stephen Cole

Re: [lang] [patch] Javadoc

Stephen Colebourne wrote: Unfortunately its the patch format thats wrong (Eclipse doesn't like it). See: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/patches.html (I think its the -u you're missing) You're right, I did miss the -u switch. Thats what happens when you try to use an GUI-application... :) In

Re: [lang] [patch] Javadoc

ommons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 11:55 PM Subject: Re: [lang] [patch] Javadoc > Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > I tried to apply the patch, but it failed, so I've done it mostly by hand > > instead. You may want to check th

Re: [lang] [patch] Javadoc

Stephen Colebourne wrote: I tried to apply the patch, but it failed, so I've done it mostly by hand instead. You may want to check the CVS again ;-) Hi! I've attached a new patch with the most obvious changes that was missed. :) Index: StringUtils.java =

[lang] [patch] Javadoc

Hi! I have attached a patch that improves the Javadoc in ArrayUtils, ClassUtils and StringUtils a little bit. Index: ArrayUtils.java === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/jakarta-commons/lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/ArrayUtils.java