Re: [lang] Re: Review for 2.1

2004-10-15 Thread Stephen Colebourne
I agree. I've committed significant changes to DurationFormatUtils, so people should check that out. I'll run through outstanding things again tomorrow if possible, and then we should consider an RC1. Its not that all the text package is bad, its just that it needs adding to and manipulating into

RE: [lang] Re: Review for 2.1

2004-10-15 Thread Gary Gregory
> > My thought is maybe we can do a release soon without the text > subpackage? IMHO, release early and release often (a la XP). We could perhaps agree that version 2.2's main goal would be to release the text package. Gary - To

[lang] Re: Review for 2.1

2004-10-14 Thread Henri Yandell
Sorry for quietness. Life's getting pretty busy and will only get busier in a week when the baby happens. On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 01:09:26 +0100, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Based on JDiff - > http://www.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.1/Commons-Lang-2.0-to-2.1/chang > es.html > I