Gary and Stephen (and anyone else who might care ;)
I'd like to take one more stab at convincing you guys that an empty
statement denoted by a semicolon would be a better approach to
indicate no action than just using a comment. I promise I'll move on
if this is not convincing enough.
So here we
.
I hope the above convinces folks too ;-)
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 9:17 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] Revisiting empty statements one more time (last time I
promise)
Gary and Stephen
points to a deficiency in the tool.
I hope the above convinces folks too ;-)
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 9:17 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] Revisiting empty statements one more
, July 04, 2005 9:17 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] Revisiting empty statements one more time (last
time I
promise)
Gary and Stephen (and anyone else who might care ;)
I'd like to take one more stab at convincing you guys that an
empty
statement denoted
Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 9:17 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] Revisiting empty statements one more time (last
time I
promise)
Gary and Stephen (and anyone else who might care ;)
I'd like to take one more stab
Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] Revisiting empty statements one more time (last
time I
promise)
It could possible be done using the GenericIllegalRegexp check. I'm
not a regexp guru so I'm not sure if an appropriate regexp could be
written, but knowing how powerful regexps are I
