Re: [lang] StrTokenizer.getCSVXxx and getTSVXxx method names.

2005-08-22 Thread Stephen Colebourne
--- Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would prefer that the methods StrTokenizer.getCSVXxx and getTSVXxx method be camel-cased like getCsvXxx and getTsvXxx. In general I prefer to camel case acronyms to help readability when more than one acronym is used, as in getIbmSoapXml() instead

[lang] StrTokenizer.getCSVXxx and getTSVXxx method names.

2005-08-21 Thread Gary Gregory
Hello All: I would prefer that the methods StrTokenizer.getCSVXxx and getTSVXxx method be camel-cased like getCsvXxx and getTsvXxx. In general I prefer to camel case acronyms to help readability when more than one acronym is used, as in getIbmSoapXml() instead of getIBMSOAPXM(). Onions? Thanks,

Re: [lang] StrTokenizer.getCSVXxx and getTSVXxx method names.

2005-08-21 Thread Steven Caswell
I agree, I prefer this naming convention also. On 8/21/05, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello All: I would prefer that the methods StrTokenizer.getCSVXxx and getTSVXxx method be camel-cased like getCsvXxx and getTsvXxx. In general I prefer to camel case acronyms to help readability