RE: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)

2005-05-24 Thread Gary Gregory
-2.1-RC6\build.xml:206: Java returned: 1 Gary From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 3:28 PM To: Gary Gregory Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6) All, I have

Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)

2005-05-24 Thread Steven Caswell
:206: Java returned: 1 Gary -- *From:* Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, May 23, 2005 3:28 PM *To:* Gary Gregory *Cc:* Jakarta Commons Developers List *Subject:* Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6) All, I have

RE: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)

2005-05-23 Thread Gary Gregory
) [javadoc] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) Could be an Ant problem... Gary -Original Message- From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 7:39 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6) RC6

RE: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)

2005-05-23 Thread Gary Gregory
: Saturday, May 21, 2005 7:39 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6) RC6 is available at http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1http://www.apache. org/%7Estevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1 Fixed is the javadoc generation to include

Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)

2005-05-23 Thread Steven Caswell
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 7:39 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6) RC6 is available at http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1http://www.apache. org/%7Estevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1 Fixed

RE: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)

2005-05-23 Thread Gary Gregory
: Monday, May 23, 2005 11:14 AM To: Gary Gregory Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6) That seems odd since I used maven to gen the sources. Will take a look. Looks like your earlier problem is fixed. On 5/23/05, Gary Gregory [EMAIL

Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)

2005-05-23 Thread Steven Caswell
1.4.2_08. Gary -- *From:* Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, May 23, 2005 11:14 AM *To:* Gary Gregory *Cc:* Jakarta Commons Developers List *Subject:* Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6) That seems odd since I used

RE: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)

2005-05-23 Thread Gary Gregory
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 11:26 AM To: Gary Gregory Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6) No, my mistake, I should have looked closer. There is a reference to that version

Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)

2005-05-23 Thread Steven Caswell
with 1.2.2. Gary -- *From:* Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, May 23, 2005 11:26 AM *To:* Gary Gregory *Cc:* Jakarta Commons Developers List *Subject:* Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6) No, my mistake, I should

Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)

2005-05-23 Thread Steven Caswell
:* Steven Caswell [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, May 23, 2005 11:26 AM *To:* Gary Gregory *Cc:* Jakarta Commons Developers List *Subject:* Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6) No, my mistake, I should have looked closer. There is a reference to that version

[lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)

2005-05-21 Thread Steven Caswell
RC6 is available at http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1http://www.apache.org/%7Estevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1 Fixed is the javadoc generation to include the overview and package notes (was being omitted due to a bug in the maven javadoc plugin). Also fixed the manifest