Re: [lang] version 2.1?

2004-01-28 Thread Maarten Coene
Hi, I would also like to see enhancement http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26056 added to lang v2.1 Can someone please add it to the code base? thanks, Maarten [lang] has seemed kind of dead lately. I don't know if I'd consider the additions you mentioned as enough for a 2.1

ArrayUtils new methods (WAS: [lang] version 2.1?)

2004-01-28 Thread Gary Gregory
Hello, I've commented in the ticket WRT to method names. All comments welcomed! Gary -Original Message- From: Maarten Coene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 08:16 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [lang] version 2.1? Hi, I would also like to see

Re: [lang] version 2.1?

2004-01-28 Thread Stephen Colebourne
I believe that a 2.1 is needed soon. We could do with drawing up a list of tasks though. I want better string to number conversions for example. Do you want to take the lead on this Gary? Stephen - Original Message - From: Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any feelings + or - on releasing

RE: [lang] version 2.1?

2004-01-28 Thread Gary Gregory
Sure, I'd be happy to. I guess I should call a [vote] to be a release manager for 2.1? Gary -Original Message- From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 12:34 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [lang] version 2.1? I believe