On 4/17/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In making Latka dormant, should we be doing anything about the 15
issues open for Latka in Bugzilla;
snip/
Over in Taglibs, when it became clear that some weren't going to see
any further development (soon), we WONTFIX'ed existing tickets -- a
On 4/17/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/17/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and should we be doing anything
about the jakarta.apache.org/commons/latka/ website?
snap/
I republished at the /sandbox/ URL, and meant to bring this up then.
Maybe we should let it
I'd prefer we didn't NOFIX any issues. Leaving them as NEW keeps their real
status and shows noone is yet working on things.
On 4/18/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/17/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In making Latka dormant, should we be doing anything about the 15
The problem with this is that it counts against our open bug statistics.
Or is that not a measure we care about?
Stephen
Dion Gillard wrote:
I'd prefer we didn't NOFIX any issues. Leaving them as NEW keeps their real
status and shows noone is yet working on things.
On 4/18/06, Rahul Akolkar
For a dormant component to have open bugs seems pretty reasonable to me.
On 4/18/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with this is that it counts against our open bug statistics.
Or is that not a measure we care about?
Stephen
Dion Gillard wrote:
I'd prefer we
In making Latka dormant, should we be doing anything about the 15
issues open for Latka in Bugzilla; and should we be doing anything
about the jakarta.apache.org/commons/latka/ website?
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
