On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 02:30 +0200, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> > My plan is to create a 1.1.1 release with Maven 2. However, Maven 2 runs
> > on a 1.4 JVM so we can't be 100% sure that the tests really pass on a
> > 1.2 JVM. The idea is that the RM will run a separate Ant sc
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
(fetchmail->jsieve->IMAP is now working fine for me in JAMES and i've
stopped buggy FETCH response crashing evolution so but i won't have
access to my old mail until i've rewritten the backend so that it will
perform against big message sets. i
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
(fetchmail->jsieve->IMAP is now working fine for me in JAMES and i've
stopped buggy FETCH response crashing evolution so but i won't have
access to my old mail until i've rewritten the backend so that it will
perform against big message sets. in short, i think i'm get
(fetchmail->jsieve->IMAP is now working fine for me in JAMES and i've
stopped buggy FETCH response crashing evolution so but i won't have
access to my old mail until i've rewritten the backend so that it will
perform against big message sets. in short, i think i'm getting commons
mail ok but i'm sh
Henri Yandell wrote:
So sounds like we need an older version of Ant.
Like I said (way below) I tried using ant 1.5.4, but that didn't work
because the build script is using features that were added to ant 1.6.
Do the Security errors happen on more modern JVMs? Are they new tests?
They wor
Is it worth pinging Simon or Robert (last 2 release managers) directly
for help - this may be going under their radar.
Niall
On 7/19/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone?
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to put together an an script that will do nothing more than
> r
So sounds like we need an older version of Ant.
Do the Security errors happen on more modern JVMs? Are they new tests?
On 7/19/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone?
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to put together an an script that will do nothing more than
> run the
Anyone?
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi
I'm trying to put together an an script that will do nothing more than
run the tests for commons logging. It's going fairly well. A couple of
issues that I found though that I need assistance with.
Failing test
The two test files in the securi
Hi
I'm trying to put together an an script that will do nothing more than
run the tests for commons logging. It's going fairly well. A couple of
issues that I found though that I need assistance with.
Failing test
The two test files in the security package both fail. These tests
