On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 20:49 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 19:38 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > I've found a small but critical problem with the "demonstration" harness
> > in class ClassLoaderRunner. When the test is *not* using a
> > context-classloader
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 20:49 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 19:38 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > I've found a small but critical problem with the "demonstration" harness
> > in class ClassLoaderRunner. When the test is *not* using a
> > context-classloader
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 19:38 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> I've found a small but critical problem with the "demonstration" harness
> in class ClassLoaderRunner. When the test is *not* using a
> context-classloader, the previous test's setting is not being cleared.
>
> Without this
Hi Robert,
I've found a small but critical problem with the "demonstration" harness
in class ClassLoaderRunner. When the test is *not* using a
context-classloader, the previous test's setting is not being cleared.
Without this patch, the following tests report "Log4JLogger does not
implement Log"
