On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 22:16 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> A week or so ago I was prompted by new activity on the logging topic to
> review what is currently sitting in SVN. I think it's actually quite
> good, and perhaps we could try to push for a release.
>
> The issues I'm aware of
robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> There have been objections about adding "dependencies", but JCL is
>> a project that already has heaps of compile-time dependencies that
>> aren't actually runtime dependencies, eg LogKit is a compile-time
>> dependency too, but isn't ne
On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 09:39 +, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
> robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >downstream maintainers
> >--
> >my major concern was about the impact of JCL dependencies on downstream
> >maintainers (rather than users). this include
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 09:39 +, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
Our current build tool (maven) is not able to distinguish between
compile-time and run-time dependencies. And some packagers don't
understand this and start to require all of the compile time
depend
On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 18:27 +0200, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 09:39 +, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
> >
> >>Our current build tool (maven) is not able to distinguish between
> >>compile-time and run-time dependencies. And some packagers
You need verson 1.9.2 of the maven-xdoc-plugin to get it to generate the
comments (it was introduced in version 1.9.0, but doesn't work in 1.9.1).
Validator uses this feature and it works well:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/validator/dependencies.html
Hopefully maven 2 will be better though
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> You need verson 1.9.2 of the maven-xdoc-plugin to get it to generate the
> comments (it was introduced in version 1.9.0, but doesn't work in 1.9.1).
>
> Validator uses this feature and it works well:
>
> http://jak
