Phil Steitz wrote:
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
1) Decide what to do about inverse cumulative probabilities where p =
1 (easy solution is to document and throw)
Nearly +1
My own nearly +1 on this just turned to -1. After looking some more
at the code and thinking some more, I think
--- Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
1) Decide what to do about inverse cumulative probabilities where p =
1 (easy solution is to document and throw)
Nearly +1
My own nearly +1 on this just turned to -1. After looking some more
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
1) Decide what to do about inverse cumulative probabilities where p =
1 (easy solution is to document and throw)
Nearly +1
My own nearly +1 on this just turned to -1. After looking some more at
the code and thinking some more, I think that both p=1 and
J.Pietschmann wrote:
2) Decide what, if anything to do about the root-finding interfaces.
I am OK releasing as is.
Uh, oh!
Does that mean that you think we need to change the interfaces. If so,
how exactly? Along the lines that I suggested earlier (stateless, value
objects returned)?
Phil
Phil Steitz wrote:
root-finding interfaces.
...
Does that mean that you think we need to change the interfaces. If so,
how exactly? Along the lines that I suggested earlier (stateless, value
objects returned)?
Actually I don't know how to proceed. It would be nice to have a common
pattern
Phil Steitz wrote:
1) Decide what to do about inverse cumulative probabilities where p = 1
(easy solution is to document and throw)
Nearly +1
2) Decide what, if anything to do about the root-finding interfaces. I
am OK releasing as is.
Uh, oh!
4) Decide what to do about RealMatrix rank. Only