Mark R. Diggory wrote:
Yes, your right, We should rather use just getEntry(x,y) and
getRowDimension/getColumnDimension shouldn't we.
Yes, below looks good and definitely an improvement over the current code.
If there are cases where access to the full matrix of the external
operand is really
Yes, your right, We should rather use just getEntry(x,y) and
getRowDimension/getColumnDimension shouldn't we.
Phil Steitz wrote:
I understand what you are trying to do here and support the basic
idea, but I don't know if this will work in general. What happens
when we want to add a sparse matrix
Mark R. Diggory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 10/11/2004 12:10 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Cc:
Subject: Re: [math] RealMatrixImpl changes was: RE: cvs commit:
jakarta-commons/math/src/test/org/apache/commons/math/linear RealMatr
Phil,
Heres a patch that shows the changes which would solve this copying
issue in the current RealMatrixImpl.
Index: RealMatrixImpl.java
===
RCS file:
/home/cvs/jakarta-commons/math/src/java/org/apache/commons/math/linear/RealMatri
Phil Steitz wrote:
Mark,
I now see (more fully) what you mean about the extra copy operations and agree that there is a little more to do than what I responded below. Using getElement and getDataRef for the current instance should suffice, however, in most cases. I need to understand better wh
Mark,
I now see (more fully) what you mean about the extra copy operations and agree that
there is a little more to do than what I responded below. Using getElement and
getDataRef for the current instance should suffice, however, in most cases. I need to
understand better what you are propos
