--- Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Al Chou wrote:
--- Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simple methods like isPositive, isNegative, etc. can be used to make
boolean expressions more human readable. I'm willing to build those two
on top of sign (I'm so generous with
--- Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I included Al's functions because they were a little more complex than
that, they provided different return type when dealing with different
evaluations. Of course these could be captured inline quite easily as
well with examples like:
d = 0 ?
--- O'brien, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 16:26, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
[-1]
Um, I'm not too clear on this one, how is calling
MathUtils.isPositive(d) clearer than (d = 0)?
[+0], Mark, if I follow the discussion correctly, the concept isn't
trying to ascertain
Mark R. Diggory wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
--- Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree. We need it ourselves, unless we want to duplicate code
between
UnivariateImpl and AbstractStoreUnivariate. Also, I personally and I
am sure
many other users would like simple array-based
