On Tuesday 20 January 2004 9:50 pm, Jeffrey D. Brekke wrote:
Fair enough. I'll dig in asap. I say wait on the NNTP patches until
after 1.2.0 since we all seem busy atm and should just focus on the
current changes. Rory's patch and bugs are first order business after
that.
It might help
On Saturday 17 January 2004 1:14 pm, Steve Cohen wrote:
This is a new vote based on new submissions as of January 17, 2004.
+1
and as of Tuesday, 20 January 2004, there have been no replies, positive or
negative. I'm eager to get this release out the door, and have time to do
it, but cannot
Steve,
I went looking to see what vote is pending. Far as I can see, it is a vote
to allow you to be a Release Manager? We vote for releases, but I am not
aware of any requirement (usual or recorded in the Commons Ettiquette docs)
requiring a vote for a Release Manager. The general rule is
On Tuesday 20 January 2004 8:57 am, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Steve,
I went looking to see what vote is pending. Far as I can see, it is a vote
to allow you to be a Release Manager? We vote for releases, but I am not
aware of any requirement (usual or recorded in the Commons Ettiquette docs)
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeffrey D. Brekke writes:
I think any committer could be the release manager, +1.
I haven't had time to look at the code changes deeply. Based on what
I've seen and what was discussed, I'm +0 on the release of 1.2.0, but
I do think that a jdk 1.1 compatible version
On Tuesday 20 January 2004 6:00 pm, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeffrey D. Brekke writes:
I think any committer could be the release manager, +1.
I haven't had time to look at the code changes deeply. Based on what
I've seen and what was discussed, I'm +0 on the
