Re: [net] JDK 1.1 question

2004-01-24 Thread Steve Cohen
On Saturday 24 January 2004 8:43 am, Steve Cohen wrote: On Friday 23 January 2004 11:57 pm, Daniel F. Savarese wrote: Since oro doesn't ship with Commons Net (or does it?) No, it doesn't, you're right. and as far as I know Commons Net does not rely on any part of the API that may have

Re: [net] JDK 1.1 question

2004-01-23 Thread Daniel F. Savarese
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Cohen writes: Question - primarily for Daniel: Do you think it makes sense to dial back to using jakarta-oro-2.0.1 in commons-net.1.1.1 to preserve JDK 1.1. compatibility? What features/bug fixes would be lost? Unless we either do this or rewrite, we

Re: [net] JDK 1.1 question

2004-01-22 Thread Steve Cohen
On Thursday 22 January 2004 12:04 am, Steve Cohen wrote: I have built a candidate release for 1.1.1. Testing it is has proven a bit problematical. I found an old Blackdown port of java 1.1.8 for Linux. I don't believe Sun ever released a port of Java 1.1 for Linux. Whether this has ever

Re: [net] JDK 1.1 question

2004-01-22 Thread Steve Cohen
On Thursday 22 January 2004 6:02 am, Steve Cohen wrote: On Thursday 22 January 2004 12:04 am, Steve Cohen wrote: I have built a candidate release for 1.1.1. Testing it is has proven a bit problematical. I found an old Blackdown port of java 1.1.8 for Linux. I don't believe Sun ever

[net] JDK 1.1 question

2004-01-21 Thread Steve Cohen
I have built a candidate release for 1.1.1. Testing it is has proven a bit problematical. I found an old Blackdown port of java 1.1.8 for Linux. I don't believe Sun ever released a port of Java 1.1 for Linux. Whether this has ever been tested on RedHat 9.0 which it predates by three years,