Re: [net] Let's get rid of org.apache.commons.net.ftp.ftp2

2004-01-05 Thread Daniel F. Savarese
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], steve cohen writes: On the fresh checkout I did, there was an ftp2 directory but it was empty. Is that another reason to get away from CVS - that it's too hard to get rid of directories? Yep. CVS doesn't treat directories the same as files. I have -P flags next to

[net] Let's get rid of org.apache.commons.net.ftp.ftp2

2004-01-02 Thread steve cohen
Since all this code has by now been moved onto the main stem (ie, org.apache.commons.net.ftp and org.apache.commons.net.ftp.parser), there is no valid reason for keeping this package and its subpackages around anymore, and it only creates maintenance issues. Is there a recommended way to go

Re: [net] Let's get rid of org.apache.commons.net.ftp.ftp2

2004-01-02 Thread Daniel F. Savarese
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], steve cohen writes: Is there a recommended way to go about this? It was doubtful to me that anyone had ever used these packages, but I now see that I was wrong. Someone went and implemented an AIXFTPEntryParser in the ftp2.parser package (and not on the main

Re: [net] Let's get rid of org.apache.commons.net.ftp.ftp2

2004-01-02 Thread steve cohen
Doh! You're right - almost. I did a fresh checkout, but the place where I saw the ftp2 stuff was the old place (which I'd renamed to get out of the way). On the fresh checkout I did, there was an ftp2 directory but it was empty. Is that another reason to get away from CVS - that it's too hard