Re: [openpgp] first cut checked into sandbox

2005-12-10 Thread Brett Porter
Thanks. I've noted it in the library, and I guess we'll need to differentiate between text files and binary files, or just remove eol-style native from that particular file :) I think it would be useful to have a text mode as we have both text files (POMs) and binary files (JARs) in the repository

Re: [openpgp] first cut checked into sandbox

2005-12-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As discussed some time back, there is an openpgp component in the sandbox. I've finally got around to taking Stefan's suggested interfaces and my tweaks, and doing a rough cut of an implementation in Bouncycastle for detached

Re: [openpgp] first cut checked into sandbox

2005-12-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The test using the checked in signature is failing for me, I'll need to find out why. Because we sign a text file and the test signature has been created on Windows while I develop on Linux. I've fixed the test by signing and

[openpgp] first cut checked into sandbox

2005-12-06 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, As discussed some time back, there is an openpgp component in the sandbox. I've finally got around to taking Stefan's suggested interfaces and my tweaks, and doing a rough cut of an implementation in Bouncycastle for detached signature creation and verification. There are a couple of known

Re: [openpgp] first cut checked into sandbox

2005-12-06 Thread Matt Benson
--- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As discussed some time back, there is an openpgp component in the sandbox. I've finally got around to taking Stefan's suggested interfaces and my tweaks, and doing a rough cut of an implementation in Bouncycastle for detached signature