Should we name it [pcollections]? Or is [primitives] better? (The sandbox
primitives is then a sandbox for the proper component for experimentation).
I had forgotten about the special io input stream stuff, which might lead to
the name [primitives]. I don't think that this affects the vote, but
+1 to primitives. It has superb logo potential :)
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Should we name it [pcollections]? Or is [primitives] better? (The sandbox
primitives is then a sandbox for the proper component for experimentation).
I had forgotten about the special io input
+1 to the name primitives over pcollections
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Should we name it [pcollections]? Or is [primitives] better? (The sandbox
primitives is then a sandbox for the proper component for experimentation).
I had forgotten about the special io input stream
I've adapted the proposal slightly for the name change, with an extra
descriptive paragraph, and less emphasis on collections. Any changes needed?
I'll include the final text in the vote result and give people a chance to
object.
Stephen
--
(0) Rationale
The Java language has a fundamental
+1 to primitives
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Should we name it [pcollections]? Or is [primitives] better? (The sandbox
primitives is then a sandbox for the proper component for experimentation).
I had forgotten about the special io input stream stuff, which might lead to
the name [primitives]. I
+1 to [primitives]
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 13:12
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [pcollections] Name change?
Should we name it [pcollections]? Or is [primitives] better? (The sandbox
