Sandy,
El mié, 15-02-2006 a las 22:20 -0500, Sandy McArthur escribió:
> It does make sense to back a FIFO pool with a java.util.Queue but the
> Queue is a Java 1.5 feature and it will be a while before Java 1.5 is
> a Pool requirement. The current version of Pool requires Java 1.3 and
> after one
It does make sense to back a FIFO pool with a java.util.Queue but the
Queue is a Java 1.5 feature and it will be a while before Java 1.5 is
a Pool requirement. The current version of Pool requires Java 1.3 and
after one more mostly bug fix release Pool 2.0 will be started which
will using Java 1.4
Hi,
I implemented an ObjectPool based on the SoftReferenceObjectPool in
commons pool. My implementation takes a java.util.queue and has no
internal synchronization, leaving that up to the queue implementation.
This is useful, for instance, in concurrent applications that share the
pool among threa