On 8/3/06, Kris Nuttycombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, all,

I'm writing to ask for suggestions about the future of commons-pipeline.
The sandbox project was started a couple of years ago when I contributed
a chunk of foundational code; however the project has never developed
much of a community and since I'm not a Commons committer getting
changes into the source repository has been a hassle for me and for
theose kind committters who have periodically helped me out. As a
consequence, due to the operational needs of my group we have continued
development under our own source control and have made significant
improvements to the API and the threading model code that have never
made it back into the jakarta repository.

Had no idea that was the history - I thought it was an offshoot of
Struts like Chain :)

Part of the problem, I think, is that the code was initially dumped into
the sandbox before the whole incubation process came along. Without the
direct involvement of a committer in the project development, I can't
see much of a future for the project in commons.

Yep, the above is definitely the problem.

Mostly a problem with our failure to pull the contributors further
into the project - you've been active on the list for a long time.

So, what do people think? If there's any interest in the project, I have
prepared a patch that can be used to bring the jakarta repository up to
date; the new additions and changes make it much easier to write unit
tests, add a bunch of documentation, and move the project to Maven 2.0.
If not, I think it may be best at this point to take the code elsewhere
and if there is sufficient interest in the future, bring it back into
jakarta through the incubation process.

Is anyone willing to sign up to be a mentor for pipeline? Take in
Kris' patches and nominate for committership when they think the time
is right?

Hen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to