Robert,
Sorry, I got really busy last week, I was meaning to setup a Vote email
and notify everyone that we are transitioning.
In terms of rc2, I believe that, since I setup our own site.jsl and css
style, that the site should still look the same no matter which
subproject is being generated,
MAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 11:52 PM
Subject: Re: [site] maven matters
> OK, I'll see at it.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <
OK, I'll see at it.
Emmanuel
- Original Message -
From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: [site] maven matters
>
> ---
--- Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 10:22 PM
> Subject: R
On 28 Mar 2004, at 22:52, Eric Pugh wrote:
I'm all for it.. As part of this, should the docs on how to cut a
release
etc be updated to use Maven versus Ant?
it's only the site generation that's (probably) going to be generated
using maven. components will still be able to use ant as their main
FYI, I've updated [lang] and [codec] such that they build with RC2
without errors.
Thank you,
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: robert burrell donkin
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 12:05
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject:
