Re: [transaction] Towards a Commons Transaction 1.2 release

2007-03-16 Thread David Blevins
On Mar 5, 2007, at 1:19 PM, Joerg Heinicke wrote: David Blevins david.blevins at visi.com writes: Anyway, I've applied your changes, built and verified each of them work with JDK 1.3, and put them all up for a vote on geronimo dev. I'm not sure what the status of your efforts are, but at the

Re: [transaction] Towards a Commons Transaction 1.2 release

2007-03-05 Thread Joerg Heinicke
David Blevins david.blevins at visi.com writes: Anyway, I've applied your changes, built and verified each of them work with JDK 1.3, and put them all up for a vote on geronimo dev. I'm not sure what the status of your efforts are, but at the very least you'll be able to use them next

Re: [transaction] Towards a Commons Transaction 1.2 release

2007-01-31 Thread David Blevins
On Jan 20, 2007, at 8:59 AM, Joerg Heinicke wrote: When doing the step one should also have in mind the necessity of 1.3 compiled Geronimo jars. David Blevins offered to help here [5, 6], but I don't know about any progress (cc-ing him). Sorry I was not able to get to this sooner (was

Re: [transaction] Towards a Commons Transaction 1.2 release

2007-01-21 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
Hi! Sorry for being mostly inactive, lately. This is not supposed to change in the next time as I am really busy, though :( However, inspite of my limited time, I still tried to bring the 1.2 release out TWICE and TWICE there - IMHO - was too much talk without leading us anywhere, effectively

[transaction] Towards a Commons Transaction 1.2 release

2007-01-20 Thread Joerg Heinicke
Hi everybody, I wonder if there can finally be a Commons Transaction 1.2 release. Half a year ago we already had a RC 3 [1] which did not get released at that time not due to a specific reason. There were discussions about getting the jars at build time [2]. This issue came up again [3] when