Re: [vfs] Interfaces Re: [vfs][REVOTE] release version 1.0

2005-12-07 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi Stephen! Another query, are you happy that you will never want to add a method to FileObject, or any other interface in VFS? No. Alternatively define FileObject (and possibly other interfaces) as an abstract class now, then you don't have the same problems. There is already a

[vfs] Interfaces Re: [vfs][REVOTE] release version 1.0

2005-12-06 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Another query, are you happy that you will never want to add a method to FileObject, or any other interface in VFS? Commons tends to be strict about not allowing changes like this. Possible solutions to adding a method in the future are - to create a FileObject2 subinterface - to go to