DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31519>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31519 Getting rid of some javadoc warn messages (3.2-dev) Summary: Getting rid of some javadoc warn messages (3.2-dev) Product: Commons Version: 3.2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: Other Component: Collections AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Salut. Just called javadoc to create the java documentation and wondered about some warnings, though everything seemed to be at the right place: Tag @link: can't find removeLRU(LinkEntry) in org.apache.commons.collections.map.LRUMap Tag @link: can't find moveToMRU(LinkEntry) in org.apache.commons.collections.map.LRUMap "LinkEntry" is a static class in AbstractLinkedMap, LRUMap derives from AbstractLinkedMap. Why javadoc does not know about "LinkEntry" then, while java itself does? The solution comes from the javadoc-API: "Nested classes must be specified as outer.inner, not simply inner, for all forms." (http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/tooldocs/solaris/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) That is the reason, why javadoc spews warnings, when [EMAIL PROTECTED] #removeLRU(LinkEntry)} is used. The correct code will look like this then: [EMAIL PROTECTED] #removeLRU(AbstractLinkedMap.LinkEntry)} Actually i have found this only in collections.map.LRUMap, its really a minor thing. But even Eclipse gave me the "wrong" code... Thanks for the collections, we use them intensily here :-) Ciao. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
