On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 07:15:32 -0400
(Subject: Re: [MATH] Re: Incubator (Re: [VOTE] New Commiter Phil Steitz))
"Mark R. Diggory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess my concern is that [math] is primarily being built by individual
> contributors and not one specific group
On Wednesday, June 11, 2003, at 06:58 AM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
The fact "most of the code contributions have been driven by
non-committers" showed the possibities these described above.
that's actually a good sign :)
projects where this happens have consistently proved more healthy than
tho
-1,
as initially proposed commons-math satisfies the commons charter.
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 06:15, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
> Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
> >>Tim,
> >>
> >>On 10 Jun 2003 16:17:11 -0500
> >>"Tim O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>If we wanted to say move commons-
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Tim,
On 10 Jun 2003 16:17:11 -0500
"Tim O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If we wanted to say move commons-math to the incubator, then I think
it would be easier to expand the community, but that community would be
external to the existing community here. Keeping co
