You can remove the synchronization of the validateObject method in
PoolableConnectionFactory but be carefull.
If the query is slow because the database is overloaded then allowing
more validationQueries will increase the problem.
For the next release I'm thinking about monitoring SQLExceptions t
This should be fixed in CVS now.
Glenn
John McNally wrote:
yes that looks like a correct observation. The synchronization scope
could be reduced.
john mcnally
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 14:47, Brad Johnson wrote:
Hello,
I noticed the latest commit to AbandonedObjectPool.java in the Jakarta Commons
yes that looks like a correct observation. The synchronization scope
could be reduced.
john mcnally
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 14:47, Brad Johnson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed the latest commit to AbandonedObjectPool.java in the Jakarta Commons DBCP
> project. The changes seem to fix some thread bl
Hello,
I noticed the latest commit to AbandonedObjectPool.java in the Jakarta Commons DBCP
project. The changes seem to fix some thread blocking that I have observed lately on
our Tomcat uPortal app.
I tried out the new nightly (9/24/03) today, and I think another point of thread
contention ha
