RE: (Logging)[Proposal] A little refactoring

2001-12-22 Thread Paulo Gaspar
. Have fun, Paulo Gaspar http://www.krankikom.de http://www.ruhronline.de -Original Message- From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 3:17 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: (Logging)[Proposal] A little refactoring On 12/21

Re: (Logging)[Proposal] A little refactoring

2001-12-21 Thread robert burrell donkin
commons-logging is currently broken. i think that it shound be fixed. maybe paulo's suggestion would make more sense as a competing branch - commons-logging 2.0? that way, people can take a look at the actual code but we don't have to stop development on other components until it's finished.

RE: (Logging)[Proposal] A little refactoring

2001-12-20 Thread Tim Vernum
From: Donnie Hale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] but can I ask where it is that log4j falls short to just use directly? http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/~checkout~/jakarta-commons/logging/PROPOSAL.html?rev=1.4content-type=text/html

RE: (Logging)[Proposal] A little refactoring

2001-12-20 Thread Scott Sanders
)[Proposal] A little refactoring That was THE reason why I adopted Avalon new wrappers instead. I ported them out of Avalon and they work just fine. There are NO dependencies from the rest of the framework except for a formatter that can be dropped. I also improved (IMHO) an existing

Re: (Logging)[Proposal] A little refactoring

2001-12-20 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, robert burrell donkin wrote: Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 22:19:33 + From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (Logging)[Proposal] A little