Re: RE: RE: [JCI] RE: JCI, JDT and Tomcat/JBoss

2006-07-22 Thread Torsten Curdt
Sorry for the late reply... The maven dependency I found is tomcat jasper-compiler-jdt 5.5.12 Uh ...looks like a self-assembled version. Not nice. I would give it go with jardiff and see how much it differs from the original jar. Don't ask me how I found it, I jus

RE: RE: [JCI] RE: JCI, JDT and Tomcat/JBoss

2006-07-19 Thread Putrycz, Erik
Curdt Sent: July 19, 2006 4:48 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: RE: [JCI] RE: JCI, JDT and Tomcat/JBoss > Concerning the statics, I was referring to the INSTANCE in > JavaCompilerFactory. The instance has a class cache which could > potentially lead to non-garbag

Re: RE: [JCI] RE: JCI, JDT and Tomcat/JBoss

2006-07-19 Thread Torsten Curdt
Concerning the statics, I was referring to the INSTANCE in JavaCompilerFactory. The instance has a class cache which could potentially lead to non-garbageable stuff. Well, the usual singleton ...should be alright. But I am not religious on that one. Also concerning the versions, what I did is

RE: [JCI] RE: JCI, JDT and Tomcat/JBoss

2006-07-18 Thread Putrycz, Erik
ta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [JCI] RE: JCI, JDT and Tomcat/JBoss > I believe the compiler links somehow to a particular version of an > interface... Even if the methods signatures are the same, if the > interface is different, I'm not sure it links correctly. That sou

Re: [JCI] RE: JCI, JDT and Tomcat/JBoss

2006-07-18 Thread Torsten Curdt
I believe the compiler links somehow to a particular version of an interface... Even if the methods signatures are the same, if the interface is different, I'm not sure it links correctly. That sounds rather bizarre to me ...I will investigate a bit The error I had with JDT 3.1 was java.lang.N