RE: [LOGGING] ClassLoader Problems

2002-04-23 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 10:50:10 +0100 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [LOGGING] ClassLoader Problems > > Craig, >

RE: [LOGGING] ClassLoader Problems

2002-04-23 Thread Ken . Horn
pril 2002 19:12 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [LOGGING] ClassLoader Problems On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, John McNally wrote: > Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:58:16 -0700 > From: John McNally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL

Re: [LOGGING] ClassLoader Problems

2002-04-22 Thread John McNally
; To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: [LOGGING] ClassLoader Problems > > > > It does not seem that static factory methods like > > > Log.getLogger(String) or Category.getInstance(String) are the best way > > > to invoke loggin

Re: [LOGGING] ClassLoader Problems

2002-04-22 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, John McNally wrote: > Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:58:16 -0700 > From: John McNally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: R

Re: [LOGGING] ClassLoader Problems

2002-04-22 Thread John McNally
It does not seem that static factory methods like > Log.getLogger(String) or Category.getInstance(String) are the best way > to invoke logging within a component meant to be used within a larger > system. > I should say it might not be a bad way to invoke the logger, but hardcoding the String

Re: [LOGGING] ClassLoader Problems

2002-04-22 Thread John McNally
I think this is a related issue, but I have not had time to investigate fully, so sorry if this is OT. I have an app, that using commons-logging in some of its dependencies, which is configured to use log4j. As commons-logging is in /common/lib, I have to put log4j in common/lib as well or I get

RE: [LOGGING] ClassLoader Problems

2002-04-22 Thread Scott Sanders
> -Original Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Scott Sanders wrote: > > The problem that I have is the LogFactoryImpl class is in the same > > class loader as LogFactory, so I am suggesting a change to > LogFactory, > > such that the

Re: [LOGGING] ClassLoader Problems

2002-04-22 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Scott Sanders wrote: > Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 09:48:54 -0700 > From: Scott Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [LOGGING] ClassLoader Problems > > Hi