Re: [VOTE] Lang 2.3 (RC3)

2007-02-11 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 2/9/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Here's the 3rd release candidate for Lang 2.3: http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang/commons-lang-2.3-rc3/ Clirr, Jardiff + Site included. [X] +1 [ ] -1 Nits: * Format release notes (other than the JIRA roadmap bits) -- width and

RE: [VOTE] Lang 2.3 (RC3)

2007-02-11 Thread Michael Heuer
MacOSX 10.4.8 G4, ant 1.6.5, maven 1.0.2 jdk 1.3.1_16 ant ok, maven fails (as below) jdk 1.4.2_09 ant & maven jdk 1.4.2_12 ant & maven jdk 1.5.0_06 ant & maven jdk 1.5.0_07 ant & maven jdk 1.6.0-dp ant & maven michael On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Gary Gregory wrote: > +1. > > Tested with: > > - Wi

RE: [VOTE] Lang 2.3 (RC3)

2007-02-11 Thread Gary Gregory
+1. Tested with: - Windows XP SP2 + current patches - Ant 1.6.5: ant clean dist test - Maven 1.0.2: maven clean site:generate - Sun Java 1.3.1_15 :ant ok - Sun Java 1.4.2_13: ant & maven - Sun Java 1.5.0_10: ant & maven - Sun Java 1.5.0_11: ant & maven - Sun Java 1.6.0: ant ok Maven failures: -

Re: [VOTE] Lang 2.3 (RC3)

2007-02-10 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 Oliver Henri Yandell wrote: Here's the 3rd release candidate for Lang 2.3: http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang/commons-lang-2.3-rc3/ Clirr, Jardiff + Site included. [ ] +1 [ ] -1 Difference from RC2 is that the sources and javadoc jars now have LICENSE/NOTICE files and the test

Re: [VOTE] Lang 2.3 (RC3)

2007-02-09 Thread Henri Yandell
Okay - 2.3 rebuilt from the tag. Shouldn't change what's there (apart from the .rej's :) ). Hen On 2/9/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Crappy - Didn't know svn status didn't display them. Agreed - building from the tag is better. Sloppy. I'll rebuild RC3. Hen On 2/9/07, Niall Pe

Re: [VOTE] Lang 2.3 (RC3)

2007-02-09 Thread Henri Yandell
Crappy - Didn't know svn status didn't display them. Agreed - building from the tag is better. Sloppy. I'll rebuild RC3. Hen On 2/9/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: One minor nitpick - theres a couple of files included in "src/test" that shouldn't be there (better to do a clean

Re: [VOTE] Lang 2.3 (RC3)

2007-02-09 Thread Niall Pemberton
One minor nitpick - theres a couple of files included in "src/test" that shouldn't be there (better to do a clean checkout from the tagged repo when cutting a RC): ObjectUtilsTest.java.rej StringUtilsTest.java.rej Not a showstopper so +1 from me Niall On 2/9/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [VOTE] Lang 2.3 (RC3)

2007-02-09 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Hen, Henri Yandell wrote: > Here's the 3rd release candidate for Lang 2.3: > > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang/commons-lang-2.3-rc3/ > > Clirr, Jardiff + Site included. > > [ ] +1 > [ ] -1 > > Difference from RC2 is that the sources and javadoc jars now have > LICENSE/NOTICE