This vote has closed, a new one based on RC5 has been initiated.
-Rahul
On 3/11/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a vote for the release [io] v1.2 based on RC3
>
> It's a new vote for clarity:
> - download doesn't depend on commons-build (Gary)
> - some tests patched (N
On 3/11/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a vote for the release [io] v1.2 based on RC3
Note that this vote is for the SVN trunk (a.k.a RC5, IIUC):
>
> [X] +1 I support this release
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1 I do not support this release because...
> ---
On 13/03/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Errors are:
>
[...]
>
> Testcase:
> testGetFreeSpace_String(org.apache.commons.io.FileSystemUtilsTestCase):
> FAILED
> expected:<9.4452176E7> but was:<4.7226088E7>
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<9.4452176E7> but
> was:<4
Errors are:
Testcase:
testThrowsOnNullList(org.apache.commons.io.FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase):
FAILED
expected:<0> but was:<1>
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<0> but was:<1>
at
org.apache.commons.io.FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase.chmod(FileUtilsCleanDirectoryTestCase.ja
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Sigs, hashes both worked fine (using KEYS from io download).
>
> Maven fails on the unpacked source zip. JDK 1.4 on OS X. The errors are in:
>
> [junit] Running org.apache.commons.io.FileSystemUtilsTestCase
> [junit] Tests run: 21, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapse
On 3/12/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The FileSystemUtils one could be interesting, as so far we've only
> really tested on general Unix (gump) and WinXP. No idea why the clean
> might fail.
>
> Can you reproduce this using your SVN copy (in Eclipse)? Otherwise
> there's not m
Based on RC4:
I can do a Maven build with Sun Java 1.4.2_10 on Windows XP SP2.
I get a Maven build failure using Java 1.3.1_15 (See below).
It tuens out that Cobertura requires Java 1.4:
"Also, Cobertura 1.2 (and 1.1, and maybe 1.0) requires a 1.4 or newer
JVM."
The above is from the 16 March
The FileSystemUtils one could be interesting, as so far we've only
really tested on general Unix (gump) and WinXP. No idea why the clean
might fail.
Can you reproduce this using your SVN copy (in Eclipse)? Otherwise
there's not much I can do.
Stephen
Henri Yandell wrote:
Sigs, hashes both
Sigs, hashes both worked fine (using KEYS from io download).
Maven fails on the unpacked source zip. JDK 1.4 on OS X. The errors are in:
[junit] Running org.apache.commons.io.FileSystemUtilsTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 21, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.311 sec
[junit] [ERROR]
Gary Gregory wrote:
Ant 1.6.5 and Maven 1.0.2 builds work for me on Window XP SP2 on Sun
Java 1.4.2_10.
Try RC4. I'm not going to restart the vote ;-)
Stephen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional command
Ant 1.6.5 and Maven 1.0.2 builds work for me on Window XP SP2 on Sun
Java 1.4.2_10.
On Sun Java 1.3.1_15, I get:
internal-test:
[mkdir] Created dir:
C:\temp\commons-io-1.2-RC3-src\build\test-reports
[junit] Running org.apache.commons.io.CopyUtilsTest
[junit] java.lang.NoClassDefFoundE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> This is a vote for the release [io] v1.2 based on RC3
>
> It's a new vote for clarity:
> - download doesn't depend on commons-build (Gary)
> - some tests patched (Niall)
> - building.html linked to commons building page (Ga
+1 for release. I checked the sigs and hashes (using KEYS from
collections download). Checked builds with jdk 1.4 and 1.5 on RH FC2,
both maven and ant.
A small problem that is not enough to -1, but you may want to fix in final:
maven dist failed for me on the distro because I did not have cobe
13 matches
Mail list logo
