Yea, I've been pushing for about 80x360 for each image, which gives
about 80px for margins, slider, toolbar etc at 600x800.
-Mark
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
On 3-Apr-04, at 21:28 Uhr, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
800x600 is, in my book, a tolerant lower end for the site layout. We are
not suggesting that
> Yes, if you tracked the previous thread, we are exploring enforcing the
> layout to be restricted so its always consistent across the site.
Generally speaking I don't like absolute positions/sizes in HTML. There is
far too great a range of resolutions, from people still using 640x480 to
1900x12
[ ] +1 yes, and I'll help
[ X ] +0 yes, go for it, but I'll just watch.
[ ] -1 no way, you've got more work before you can do this.
Sorry, I'm not totally up to speed on what has to be done, but I'm in general
favor of the look that maven gives the site.
Steve Cohen
Hi,
>http://jakarta.apache.org/commons-mavenized
>
>
>[ ] +1 yes, and I'll help
>[ X ] +0 yes, go for it, but I'll just watch.
>[ ] -1 no way, you've got more work before you can do this.
Looks good. Can the left frame be made a tiny bit wider so that
"Releasing Components" is on one line? (I'
: Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Vote][all] migrate top level commons site to mavenized
version.
> The site looks great, it would be even better if it passed the markup
> validation ;)
>
>
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A//jakarta.apache.org/comm
The site looks great, it would be even better if it passed the markup
validation ;)
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A//jakarta.apache.org/commons-mavenized/
The new version has much less errors than the previous one though,
that's a great achievement:
http://validator.w3.org/
[X] +1 yes, and I'll help
[ ] +0 yes, go for it, but I'll just watch.
[ ] -1 no way, you've got more work before you can do this.
No access yet, but if I can help I will.
btw: Thanks, for great work!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[x] +1 yes, and I'll help
[ ] +0 yes, go for it, but I'll just watch.
[ ] -1 no way, you've got more work before you can do this.
-- Jeanfrancois
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
> [ ] +1 yes, and I'll help
> [X] +0 yes, go for it, but I'll just watch.
> [ ] -1 no way, you've got more work before you can do this.
It would be nice if the icons (particularly the Jakarta one) were a bit
smaller, so that they both fit in a default-s
We had one request to remove it from the top, if that person is still
adverse to it, we'll have to discuss. I'm fine with having it in the
default place.
-Mark
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 17:51, David Graham wrote:
> +1
>
> Can we move the published date from the bottom of the page to the bar
> under
I think we can work on this after...It'll be easier then at least since
the uri's can matchup better. xdoc is a little picky about what uri's it
will expand on the navigation bar, I think full url's don't get
expanded.
-Mark
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 17:48, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> [x] +1 yes, and
> [x] +1 yes, and I'll help
> [ ] +0 yes, go for it, but I'll just watch.
> [ ] -1 no way, you've got more work before you can do this.
Gary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
+0
And thanks for all the hard work - it looks great.
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 09:44, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
> All,
>
> We'd like to have a vote to verify everyone is in agreement to push the
> commons-mavenized site over to replace the existing commons top level
> site.
+1
Can we move the published date from the bottom of the page to the bar
under the header images to match the project pages? As a user I often
check the published date to see if things changed since I last visited.
Having this date in a consistent and prominent place would be nice.
David
---
[x] +1 yes, and I'll help
[ ] +0 yes, go for it, but I'll just watch.
[ ] -1 no way, you've got more work before you can do this.
My only comment is that I would have preferred for the Components to have
been visible in the left nav on the home page. But lets not stop things now
;-)
BTW, anyone k
Mark R. Diggory wrote:
All,
We'd like to have a vote to verify everyone is in agreement to push the
commons-mavenized site over to replace the existing commons top level
site.
Please look over the mavenized site and vote appropriately. (Note: many
of the links do return to the main site, these wil
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
>
> [x] +1 yes, and I'll help
> [ ] +0 yes, go for it, but I'll just watch.
> [ ] -1 no way, you've got more work before you can do this.
Alex
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
> [x] +1 yes, and I'll help
> [ ] +0 yes, go for it, but I'll just watch.
> [ ] -1 no way, you've got more work before you can do this.
Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 31-Mar-04, at 23:44 Uhr, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
We'd like to have a vote to verify everyone is in agreement to push the
commons-mavenized site over to replace the existing commons top level
site.
Please look over the mavenized site and vote appropriately. (Note: many
of the links do return to t
Looks great.
[ ] +1 yes, and I'll help
[X] +0 yes, go for it, but I'll just watch. ---> "I can help with the [net] site"
[ ] -1 no way, you've got more work before you can do this.
--
=
Jeffrey D. Brekke
Mark R. Diggory wrote:
[x] +1 yes, and I'll help
[ ] +0 yes, go for it, but I'll just watch.
[ ] -1 no way, you've got more work before you can do this.
Looks great ... thanks to everyone who worked on this.
Craig
-
To unsubs
On 31 Mar 2004, at 22:44, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
[x] +1 yes, and I'll help
[ ] +0 yes, go for it, but I'll just watch.
[ ] -1 no way, you've got more work before you can do this.
looks good :)
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Ok, its regenerated now. Take a look
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 16:45, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
> Opse, the site needs regeneration. I'll repost when its finished
>
> -Mark
>
> On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 16:44, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > We'd like to have a vote to verify everyone is in agreem
Mark R. Diggory wrote:
All,
We'd like to have a vote to verify everyone is in agreement to push the
commons-mavenized site over to replace the existing commons top level
site.
Please look over the mavenized site and vote appropriately. (Note: many
of the links do return to the main site, these wil
Opse, the site needs regeneration. I'll repost when its finished
-Mark
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 16:44, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
> All,
>
> We'd like to have a vote to verify everyone is in agreement to push the
> commons-mavenized site over to replace the existing commons top level
> site.
>
> Pleas
25 matches
Mail list logo
