Re: [Wiki SPAM]

2004-06-05 Thread matthew.hawthorne
Noel J. Bergman wrote: Or perhaps we should have a [EMAIL PROTECTED] list that committers should subscribe too. Its simple and keeps these messages out of the archives. that would be really cool. and CVS-SPAM too... See, when someone starts talking about CVS commit notices as SPAM, I know that th

Re: [Wiki SPAM]

2004-06-05 Thread Konstantin Priblouda
--- Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Or perhaps we should have a > [EMAIL PROTECTED] list that > committers should subscribe too. Its simple and > keeps these messages out of > the archives. that would be really cool. and CVS-SPAM too... commons is pretty big, and it's dificult t

Re: [Wiki SPAM]

2004-06-04 Thread Dirk Verbeeck
k Verbeeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 1:41 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [Wiki SPAM] A lot of these wiki changes come from apache committers. Do you think it is possible to tag these changes so we can skip reviewing these for vandalism? But I want to

Re: [Wiki SPAM]

2004-06-04 Thread Dirk Verbeeck
If I see a wiki mail that "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" has updated "Logging/1.0.4ReleasePlan" then I will look at it differently then if an unknown user does it. I thrust Robert more and so I only look at the page at the end of the week. If an unknown user does an update then I/we should review it asap.

RE: [Wiki SPAM]

2004-06-04 Thread Martin Cooper
> -Original Message- > From: Dirk Verbeeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 1:41 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [Wiki SPAM] > > > A lot of these wiki changes come from apache committers. > Do you think it is possi

RE: [Wiki SPAM]

2004-06-04 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> A lot of these wiki changes come from apache committers. > Do you think it is possible to tag these changes so we > can skip reviewing these for vandalism? Do you skip reviewing CVS commits because they came from a fellow committer? I hope people are reviewing changes. And the Wiki changes don'

Re: [Wiki SPAM]

2004-06-04 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Or perhaps we should have a [EMAIL PROTECTED] list that committers should subscribe too. Its simple and keeps these messages out of the archives. Stephen - Original Message - From: "Dirk Verbeeck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > A lot of these wiki changes come from apache committers. > Do you thin

Re: [Wiki SPAM]

2004-06-04 Thread Dirk Verbeeck
A lot of these wiki changes come from apache committers. Do you think it is possible to tag these changes so we can skip reviewing these for vandalism? I don't know the inner workings of the moin wiki system but if we could separate the changes from committers from the rest it would certainly r

RE: [Wiki SPAM] Re: [Jakarta_Commons_Wiki]_Updated:__BeanUtils/1.7.0ReleasePlan

2004-06-04 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> Do you think it's helpfull to see an email for EVERY > trivial edit in Jakarta_Commons_Wiki ? > I think one message per 24 hours, like one sent by > codehaus's confluence would be sufficient. I'm not particularly keen to see wiki vandalism sitting untouched for 24 hours, or longer if people don