Re: [all] why junit 3.7 instead of 3.8.1?

2003-10-18 Thread __matthewHawthorne
I usually read the release notes to discover the differences between versions. There are only a few noticable changes between 3.7 and 3.8.1: - Deleted deprecated assert(boolean) in favor of assertTrue(boolean) and assertFalse(boolean). To migrate to JUnit 3.8, rename calls to assert(boolean) t

Re: [all] why junit 3.7 instead of 3.8.1?

2003-10-18 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Probably because 3.7 does all they need. I've no idea what extra I gain by 3.8.1. And if users only have 3.7 then we don't require them to get another jar. Stephen - Original Message - From: "__matthewHawthorne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: [all] why junit 3.7 instead of 3.8.1?

2003-10-17 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, The usual reason for not-latest dependencies: when you start using X (X = JUnit here), you start with a given version, e.g. 3.7. Everything works fine, there's no urgent reason to upgrade, we're all busy, so it stays the same. Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics >-Original Messa