RE: [codec] 1.3 Release Candidate Status

2004-05-10 Thread Gary Gregory
k you, Gary > -Original Message- > From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 19:45 > To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' > Subject: RE: [codec] 1.3 Release Candidate Status > > Yes, quiet is an understatement. :-) I ne

RE: [codec] 1.3 Release Candidate Status

2004-05-09 Thread Tim O'Brien
4 1:37 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: [codec] 1.3 Release Candidate Status > > Unless I hear some noise (better Clover or otherwise), I would like to > propose to cut a 1.3 RC1. Things have been quiet and stable. > > Thank you, > Gary > > >

RE: [codec] 1.3 Release Candidate Status

2004-05-07 Thread Gary Gregory
s Developers List > Subject: RE: [codec] 1.3 Release Candidate Status > > Are there any volunteers to improve Clover unit test coverage for the > 1.3 release? What we have today is pretty good but some classes could be > better covered. > > Thank you, > Gary > >

RE: [codec] 1.3 Release Candidate Status

2004-05-04 Thread Gary Gregory
004 10:58 > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: [codec] 1.3 Release Candidate Status > > Sounds good, I'd like to take this time to fully test DoubleMetaphone, > I'll get to it this weekend. > > Tim > > On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Gary Gregory wrote: >

RE: [codec] 1.3 Release Candidate Status

2004-04-30 Thread Gary Gregory
Tim, Any news on this task? No worries, I'm busy too ;-) Thank you, Gary > -Original Message- > From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 10:58 > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: [codec] 1.3 Release Candidat

RE: [codec] 1.3 Release Candidate Status

2004-04-22 Thread Gary Gregory
From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 10:58 > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: [codec] 1.3 Release Candidate Status > > Sounds good, I'd like to take this time to fully test DoubleMetaphone, > I'll get to it th

RE: [codec] 1.3 Release Candidate Status

2004-04-22 Thread Tim O'Brien
wants to do is welcome ;-) > > Thank you, > Gary > > > -Original Message- > > From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 15:14 > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > Subject: RE: [codec] 1.3 Release Candidate Sta

RE: [codec] 1.3 Release Candidate Status

2004-04-22 Thread Gary Gregory
arta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: [codec] 1.3 Release Candidate Status > > > Gary, let me know if you need any support for the release. I'd like > to > > pass > > the baton off to you as it isn't a good idea to monopolize release > > manageme

RE: [codec] 1.3 Release Candidate Status

2004-04-20 Thread Gary Gregory
> Gary, let me know if you need any support for the release. I'd like to > pass > the baton off to you as it isn't a good idea to monopolize release > management. Tim, You're not monopolizing anything Tim ;-) AFAIAC, the committer that has the time and the inclination can do it. Right, I've got

RE: [codec] 1.3 Release Candidate Status

2004-04-18 Thread Tim O'Brien
his code was (outright) copied from a C++ program, there was no need to keep track of the length of our StringBuffer in a variable named "mtsz". That's gone, and the only reason this was possible was great code coverage. Tim > -Original Message- > From: Gary Gregory [mail

RE: [codec] 1.3 Release Candidate Status

2004-04-18 Thread Gary Gregory
ommons Developers List > Subject: Re: [codec] 1.3 Release Candidate Status > > Gary > Has the problem reported by Tom van den Berge been looked into? > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-commons-dev&m=108201900324974&w= 2 > > If not, I believe it should be

Re: [codec] 1.3 Release Candidate Status

2004-04-18 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
Gary Has the problem reported by Tom van den Berge been looked into? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-commons-dev&m=108201900324974&w=2 If not, I believe it should be Oleg On Sun, 2004-04-18 at 19:33, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hello all, > > It seems to me that we should start the releas