RE: [codec] Soundex / Refined Soundex

2003-12-04 Thread Gary Gregory
Greene') > GO > > Here is the result set: > > - ----- --- > G650 G650 4 > > (1 row(s) affected) > > - - --- > B432 G650 0 > > (1 row(s) affected) > > > > -Original Message- > From: Inger, Matt

RE: [codec] Soundex / Refined Soundex

2003-12-04 Thread Inger, Matthew
ject: RE: [codec] Soundex / Refined Soundex Any thoughts on the "difference" method? -Original Message- From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 12:18 PM To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' Subject: RE: [codec] Soundex /

RE: [codec] Soundex / Refined Soundex

2003-12-04 Thread Inger, Matthew
Any thoughts on the "difference" method? -Original Message- From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 12:18 PM To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' Subject: RE: [codec] Soundex / Refined Soundex Hello, Thank you for you

RE: [codec] Soundex / Refined Soundex

2003-12-04 Thread Gary Gregory
Hello, Thank you for your interest in [codec]. Soundex is, well, Soundex, a method to find word with similar phonemes. Refined Sounder, OTOH, is more geared towards spellchecking. For example: new Soundex().encode("testing") returns "T235" new RefinedSoundex().encode("testing") returns "T60360