Re: [codec] promote from sandbox - RE: commons codec and Base64

2003-04-02 Thread robert burrell donkin
i started a commons etiquette page on the wiki a little while ago which contains some opinions on the promotion process: http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaCommonsEtiquette it might of some help a little further down the line. - robert On Wednesday, April 2, 2003, at 07:07

RE: [codec] promote from sandbox - RE: commons codec and Base64

2003-04-02 Thread O'brien, Tim
-Original Message- From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Promotion is probably a good idea, but it should be without backwards compatability code IMO. You imply that there is a codec 1.0 release, but this cannot be as sandbox components may not have releases...

RE: [codec] promote from sandbox

2003-04-02 Thread Gary Gregory
: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 11:53 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [codec] promote from sandbox Just read the etiquette thing. I think a good indicator that Codec Base64 is ready for consumption is its successful integration in both HttpClient and XML-RPC. I see that it is used

RE: [codec] promote from sandbox - RE: commons codec and Base64

2003-04-02 Thread Gary Gregory
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 1:45 PM To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' Subject: RE: [codec] promote from sandbox - RE: commons codec and Base64 -Original Message- From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Promotion is probably a good idea

RE: [codec] promote from sandbox - RE: commons codec and Base64

2003-04-02 Thread Rodney Waldhoff
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, O'brien, Tim wrote: I don't think it is a good policy to require backwards compatibility for sandbox components, but I think we have a special case here since codec has been in use for a sustained period of time. Rarely is backwards compatiblity a bad thing. - Rod