If I append something asynchronously to the end of the list while a Cursor
is open, will the cursor pick that up? Or, does a cursor merely take a
snap-shot of the underlying list and iterate over whatever is there
currently? Just curious.
- Original Message -
From: Rodney Waldhoff
Nevermind, RTFM. Sorry, folks.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: [collections] deprecate CursorableLinkedList?
If I append something asynchronously to the end of the list while a Cursor
is open
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I append something asynchronously to the end of the list while a Cursor
is open, will the cursor pick that up?
Yes.
Or, does a cursor merely take a
snap-shot of the underlying list and iterate over whatever is there
currently?
No. Not a
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Rodney Waldhoff wrote:
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rodney Waldhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [collections] deprecate CursorableLinkedList?
If there are no
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 05:03, Rodney Waldhoff wrote:
If there are no complaints, I'd like to deprecate CursorableLinkedList for
the 3.0 collections release, to be removed in the 4.0 release.
Bugger. I was just intending to propose using this class from within
commons-digester.
It would be no
Since both Craig and you have expressed an interest in keeping this class
around, I'm more than happy to leave it.
Let's remove implements Serializable for the 3.0 release, unless someone
feels like making it work (probably a missing a transient somewhere).
On Thu, 19 Sep 2003, Simon Kitching
Bugger. I was just intending to propose using this class from within
commons-digester.
So just say so. That sounds like two -1's from people who want to use it.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 09:38, Rodney Waldhoff wrote:
Since both Craig and you have expressed an interest in keeping this class
around, I'm more than happy to leave it.
Let's remove implements Serializable for the 3.0 release, unless someone
feels like making it work (probably a missing a
