Re: [email] dumbster *nix

2004-11-04 Thread Corey Scott
In addition to this (and to post to this list, what we have been discussion privately). I have added a method to the dumbster which takes a server socket as an input instead of a port number. The advantage of this is that you can create the server socket using: ServerSocket newSocket = new Server

Re: [email] dumbster *nix

2004-11-04 Thread Mark Lowe
Okay.. I just got a fresh src of dumbster changed the port to 2500 and the port 80 test to 2580 and it passes its own tests.. Not sure why it stopped working after my tests yesterday, i must have messed with something i shouldn't have. Lets see how i get on with the commons email tests.. On T

Re: [email] dumbster *nix

2004-11-04 Thread Mark Lowe
Eric I don't have any issues working with dumbster, if indeed it works. Now I've the dumbster source and I can replicate the same problem running dumbster tests at least that helps identify the problem. Hopefully they'll be a head version in cvs that can be patched. When I get time I'll have a go

RE: [email] dumbster *nix

2004-11-04 Thread Eric Pugh
Mark, Maybe you can clear something up for me.. As far as I know, with JavaMail, I still have to have *some* SMTP server running somewhere to send emails. Are you saying that if I include smtp.jar, that acts as my SMTP server? I don't have a problem factoring out the email smtp stuff into the Mai