RE: [id] Composite identifiers

2006-02-21 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Phil, Phil Steitz wrote on Monday, February 20, 2006 6:28 AM: > Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Jörg Schaible wrote on Monday, February 06, 2006 9:07 PM: >> [snip] >>> Looks fine. I've added the missing minLength/maxLength >>> implementations and made it serializable. I would add a >>> ConstantIdenti

Re: [id] Composite identifiers

2006-02-19 Thread Phil Steitz
Jörg Schaible wrote: Jörg Schaible wrote on Monday, February 06, 2006 9:07 PM: Hi Phil, Phil Steitz wrote: I just committed a first cut at a CompositeIdentifierGenerator along the lines of what we have discussed. To replace the prefix generators with this, we either have to modify t

RE: Re: [id] Composite identifiers

2006-02-13 Thread Jörg Schaible
Jörg Schaible wrote on Monday, February 06, 2006 9:07 PM: > Hi Phil, > > Phil Steitz wrote: > >> I just committed a first cut at a CompositeIdentifierGenerator along >> the lines of what we have discussed. To replace the prefix >> generators with this, we either have to modify the factories or

Re: [id] Composite identifiers

2006-02-06 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Phil, Phil Steitz wrote: > I just committed a first cut at a CompositeIdentifierGenerator along > the lines of what we have discussed. To replace the prefix generators > with this, we either have to modify the factories or introduce a > ConstantIdentifierGenerator. If others (Michael?) have

RE: [id] Composite identifiers

2005-04-04 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Phil, Phil Steitz wrote on Sunday, April 03, 2005 7:57 PM: > Last night I added the "prefixed" identifier generators > contributed by Michael Heuer in BZ 34254 (Thanks, Michael!). > These made me think again of something that we discussed a > while back: composite identifiers. The prefixed id