From: "Arun Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I agree completely that backwards compatibility is important! Your
earlier comment: "I plan to change that to extend StringUtils once 2.0 is
released" led me to assume that Ustring does not currently extend
StringUtils. If that is the case, I'm terribly c
I agree completely that backwards compatibility is important! Your earlier comment:
"I plan to change that to extend StringUtils once 2.0 is released" led me to assume
that Ustring does not currently extend StringUtils. If that is the case, I'm terribly
confused as to how backward compatibilit
