I notice that the code coverage report was generated use Cobertura
version 1.6. How about migrating to the current version 1.8?
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 9:41 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Sub
On 9/20/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Should we be using viewcvs.cgi still now we are on svn? Or is there a
viewvc.cgi?
Fixed for next rc.
- Tasks xdoc needs Stringbuf removing.
Fixed for next rc.
- The release notes mentions changes from 2.0 to 2.1, which it probabl
On 9/20/06, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - the jar is getting a little porky, at nearly 250K.
>
> 3.0 and removing deprecations might help a little there.
Should we plan on delivering whatever we delete, like the enum package,
in a separate jar for backwards binary compatibility?
-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 2:37 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] 2.2 RC1 rolled and ready for comments
>
> On 9/20/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - Should we
; Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 2:23 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] 2.2 RC1 rolled and ready for comments
>
> - Should we be using viewcvs.cgi still now we are on svn? Or is there
a
> viewvc.cgi?
>
> - Tasks xdoc needs Stringbuf removing.
>
On 9/20/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Should we be using viewcvs.cgi still now we are on svn? Or is there a
viewvc.cgi?
- Tasks xdoc needs Stringbuf removing.
- The release notes mentions changes from 2.0 to 2.1, which it probably
shouldn't.
- jar manifest doesn't include
- Should we be using viewcvs.cgi still now we are on svn? Or is there a
viewvc.cgi?
- Tasks xdoc needs Stringbuf removing.
- The release notes mentions changes from 2.0 to 2.1, which it probably
shouldn't.
- jar manifest doesn't include the X-... attributes detailed in the
release docs for
Our application builds and all tests pass with 2.2-rc1.
So, that's +1.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 9:41 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: [lang] 2.2 RC1 rolled and ready for comments
>
>