[lang][patch] Tests for math sub-package (was RE: [lang] Better coverage for StrBuilder and StrTokenizer.)

2005-07-31 Thread Nathan Beyer
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: RE: [lang] Better coverage for StrBuilder and StrTokenizer. As far as other areas, please look at the clover report [1] or generate one yourself with Maven and feel free to up the %'s in any deficient area. Thanks, Gary [1] http://people.apache.org/~ggregory

RE: [lang][patch] Tests for math sub-package (was RE: [lang] Better coverage for StrBuilder and StrTokenizer.)

2005-07-31 Thread Nathan Beyer
Missed the other attachment. -Original Message- From: Nathan Beyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2005 4:21 PM To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' Subject: [lang][patch] Tests for math sub-package (was RE: [lang] Better coverage for StrBuilder and StrTokenizer

RE: [lang][patch] Tests for math sub-package (was RE: [lang] Better coverage for StrBuilder and StrTokenizer.)

2005-07-31 Thread Gary Gregory
- From: Nathan Beyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2005 3:25 PM To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' Subject: RE: [lang][patch] Tests for math sub-package (was RE: [lang] Better coverage for StrBuilder and StrTokenizer.) Missed the other attachment. -Original

RE: [lang] Better coverage for StrBuilder and StrTokenizer.

2005-07-30 Thread Nathan Beyer
I'm willing to do some JUnit building. Any other areas that need more testing? I presume you're working off the main trunk. -Original Message- From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 12:18 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: [lang] Better

RE: [lang] Better coverage for StrBuilder and StrTokenizer.

2005-07-30 Thread Nathan Beyer
] Better coverage for StrBuilder and StrTokenizer. I'm willing to do some JUnit building. Any other areas that need more testing? I presume you're working off the main trunk. -Original Message- From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 12:18 PM To: Jakarta

RE: [lang] Better coverage for StrBuilder and StrTokenizer.

2005-07-30 Thread Gary Gregory
Developers List' Subject: RE: [lang] Better coverage for StrBuilder and StrTokenizer. I'm willing to do some JUnit building. Any other areas that need more testing? I presume you're working off the main trunk. -Original Message- From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

RE: [lang] Better coverage for StrBuilder and StrTokenizer.

2005-07-30 Thread Gary Gregory
PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 2:57 PM To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' Subject: RE: [lang] Better coverage for StrBuilder and StrTokenizer. I'm willing to do some JUnit building. Any other areas that need more testing? I presume you're working off the main trunk

RE: [lang] Better coverage for StrBuilder and StrTokenizer.

2005-07-30 Thread Gary Gregory
] Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 3:58 PM To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' Subject: RE: [lang] Better coverage for StrBuilder and StrTokenizer. Attached is a patch with some additional StrBuilder tests and some small fixes. I'll try to put some more together later. -Original Message