Re: [net] Re: problem with RCommandClient

2002-10-30 Thread Daniel F. Savarese
results in the socket getting closed. so the remote process never completes - it hangs waiting for an EOF - or it ends when I close the stream, but I can't read its output because the socket gets closed. rock and a hard place, so to speak :) You're not between a rock and a hard

RE: [net] Re: problem with RCommandClient

2002-10-30 Thread Kevin Seguin
Message- From: Daniel F. Savarese [mailto:dfs;savarese.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 9:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [net] Re: problem with RCommandClient results in the socket getting closed. so the remote process never completes - it hangs waiting for an EOF

RE: [net] Re: problem with RCommandClient

2002-10-30 Thread Daniel F. Savarese
well, it just seemed that by default RCommandClient did not work as one would expect. but I'm happy with the subclassing approach - it works You're probably right that at least RExecClient and RCommandClient should allow for half duplex connections, and as you indicated, it's not a major

RE: [net] Re: problem with RCommandClient

2002-10-30 Thread Jeffrey D. Brekke
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Daniel F. Savarese wrote: [SNIPPED] I think what we ought to do is freeze the code and get evertyhing in shape to meet the requirements to become a Commons proper project, make a formal 1.x.x release to supercede NetComponents 1.3.8, and then talk about cutting off

RE: [net] Re: problem with RCommandClient

2002-10-29 Thread Kevin Seguin
yeah, sorry, it is j-c-net. -Original Message- From: Henri Yandell [mailto:bayard;generationjava.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:55 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: [???] Re: problem with RCommandClient Not to be mean, but could you prefix the mail