Re: [sandbox] active components?

2004-05-31 Thread Stephen Colebourne
From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > reflect > > Never got finished, releatively unlikely to > > Just curious - why do you say it's relatively unlikely to be finished? It seems very low down Robert and My priority list, and I'm not that convinced about the need. Especially as I no longe

Re: [sandbox] active components?

2004-05-30 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sun, 16 May 2004, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > convert > I've been too busy to put time into this, but I reckon there is definitely a > need. > > > primitives > Now in commons proper (sandbox version deleted) > > > reflect > Never got finished, relea

Re: [sandbox] active components?

2004-05-30 Thread Martin Cooper
AFAIK, both Chain and Resources are in pretty good shape, and are awaiting one of their committers to step up to the plate. Unfortunately, we / they are all pretty busy right now, but I expect that the effort will go in to getting these promoted and released shortly after Struts 1.2.1 happens. --

Re: [sandbox] active components?

2004-05-18 Thread robert burrell donkin
hi oliver releases of sandbox components by the jakarta-common team are forbidden. (i believe that - with pmc approval - that slide could release a sandbox component for it's own purposes.) so, what's needed is promotion to the jakarta commons. of course, one of the major is that the component

Re: [sandbox] active components?

2004-05-17 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
Although newly created package transaction is active and actually almost feature complete as it has been factored out from the Jakarta Slide Project. What is involved to make a release or is it pre-mature to think about it now? Oliver Henri Yandell wrote: I'm interested in finding out which par

Re: [sandbox] active components?

2004-05-17 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
Right now the code for persisting sequences is in the transaction package along with other code that transactionally modifies files. Should we move it into the Id project or should we try to release both packages along and have Id use Transation? Still wondering... Oliver Tim Reilly wrote: Id

Re: [sandbox] active components?

2004-05-16 Thread Stephen Colebourne
From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > convert I've been too busy to put time into this, but I reckon there is definitely a need. > primitives Now in commons proper (sandbox version deleted) > reflect Never got finished, releatively unlikely to > Clazz Completed, but no great demand > Even

RE: [sandbox] active components?

2004-05-16 Thread Tim Reilly
> Id Id is active. In terms of a release... we have some work to do on uuid stability and changing the api to match with jdk 1.5. The other identifiers have a longer history and spun-off from lang. Oliver Zeigermann has proposed some new work on sequence persistence. After that I'd imagine a relea

Re: [sandbox] active components?

2004-05-15 Thread Joe Germuska
At 12:09 AM -0400 5/15/04, Henri Yandell wrote: I'm interested in finding out which parts of sandbox are not active and which would be worth putting time into getting a release done. chain chain is expected to be a core part of Struts 1.3.x; I've been using it with Struts for a while and don't kno

RE: [sandbox] active components?

2004-05-15 Thread Leo Sutic
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This definitely sounds like a worry. > > Our site has informally released the snapshot versions as > (effectively) an alpha release. Is Spring dependent on these > versions too? As far as I know, Spring is using the snapshot version from j

RE: [sandbox] active components?

2004-05-15 Thread Henri Yandell
This definitely sounds like a worry. Our site has informally released the snapshot versions as (effectively) an alpha release. Is Spring dependent on these versions too? Documentation looks good. Do you have a roadmap for finishing that? What future does Attributes have with the 1.5 Annotations

RE: [sandbox] active components?

2004-05-15 Thread Leo Sutic
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I'm interested in finding out which parts of sandbox are not > active and which would be worth putting time into getting a > release done. > > Currently on the Commons site we list these as the active > components, which are actually activ

Re: [sandbox] active components?

2004-05-15 Thread Stephen Colebourne
From: "Mario Ivankovits" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I never thought a sandbox component could have a release too, but great > to see :-) It can't. Henri means promotion to commons proper, then release ;-) And I hope that vfs can achieve this, but bear in mind that to do so all your dependecies must als

Re: [sandbox] active components?

2004-05-14 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Henri Yandell wrote: From the point of "commons-vfs": Currently on the Commons site we list these as the active components, which are actually active and where are they release wise? bzip2 the cvs seems empty - maybe moved to compress? compress this might be a dependency for vfs in the future