RE: [scxml] compliance with SCXML Working Draft

2006-01-16 Thread Tim OBrien
Good to hear that a stricter definition is on the way, I noticed that section 5.1 had constraints on attributes, but I didn't see any in 3.1. Let me ask you another question while I've got your attention, any plans to release an XML Schema for the SCXML standard? ...this brings up another issue

RE: [scxml] compliance with SCXML Working Draft

2006-01-16 Thread Barnett, James
We hope to have a new working draft of the SCXML spec out soon (i.e. a week or two), which will tighten up the syntactic definition. The 'initialstate' attribute will be required. In general, for conformance issues, we will want to focus on the new draft, rather than the existing one. (But the